Wednesday, June 8, 2011

footnotes chicago style

footnotes chicago style. About Chicago style
  • About Chicago style



  • sparuthi
    08-10 04:34 PM
    PD March 2006
    RD July 26. 2007
    ND August 27. 2007





    footnotes chicago style. How To Use Footnotes Chicago
  • How To Use Footnotes Chicago



  • vallabhu
    11-29 03:26 PM
    My attorney received a letter saying "Intent to Deny" reason being not having Mats in graduation.

    But the fact is I have Maths and I did 4 Math courses in graduation and provisional clearly shows maths1, Maths2, maths3, maths4.

    Letter says Vallabhu has done Courses in Sanskrit,English, Physics and Geology but nothing in Maths.

    and This how each year of transcripts look like

    Physics1
    Maths1
    Geology1

    Physics2
    Maths2
    Geology2

    Physics3
    Maths3
    Maths4
    Geology3

    I don't know how can he miss Maths from this.


    Does any one else heard/faced a similar issue in the past.





    footnotes chicago style. How To Use Footnotes Chicago
  • How To Use Footnotes Chicago



  • seltzer
    02-12 03:42 PM
    Yes, that is not only possible, but safer than using EAD. If your I-485 is denied for whatever reason, you still have H1-B with which to keep working. Once you use EAD, you lose H1-B status, and if I-485 is denied, you are out of status and must leave the country immediately.





    footnotes chicago style. Chicago Manual of Style,
  • Chicago Manual of Style,



  • amitjoey
    08-23 10:40 AM
    I do not understand what the need is to change to F1. One can do Masters while on H4. If you are thinking she needs OPT to work after Masters, It is a 2 year course, right?. You can decide after 1-1/2 yrs if you want her to move to F1.



    more...


    footnotes chicago style. Chicago amp; Turabian Style basic
  • Chicago amp; Turabian Style basic



  • roseball
    02-11 05:32 PM
    Hi everyone,

    Today i got an alert form USCIS that the pending 485s (for my wife and myself) have been transferred from NSC to TSC. Wanted to see if others with 485s pending at NSC have seen similar action.

    My priority date is Oct 2005 and my 485 has been pending at NSC since July 2007.

    Since TSC is almost current in processing I-485 applications, it could be that NSC might be transferring some applications to lower their I-485 pending case load.





    footnotes chicago style. Chicago: University of Chicago
  • Chicago: University of Chicago



  • alterego
    05-28 09:49 AM
    As a quadruple renewer, let me share with you that the date on the EAD is from the point at which it is approved. You lose some time each year. Between myself and my wife we have had 8 and it has been the same each time.



    more...


    footnotes chicago style. Chicago-style sample paper.
  • Chicago-style sample paper.



  • ndswaiting
    05-01 06:15 PM
    I have been a silent follower of IV for more than a year but this is my first post so be kind :)

    I am a full time employee. My 140 was approved in Jan 2008 and I am one of those who missed the July'07 fiasco (as you can see from my PD :().

    I am being given an opportunity to join another team in my company. I do not want to impact the GC process but do not want to let go of this opportunity.

    The other team is ready to replicate my roles and responsibilities as per my PERM and give me a similar title. My company lawyer believes that this would be the best approach and would not hamper my existing PERM and I140 and I would not have to restart my GC process.

    I am reaching out to the collective knowledge base of the IV community for their insights/inputs/comments and red flags to watch out for.

    Thanks in advance :)





    footnotes chicago style. FOOTNOTES CHICAGO - Page 7
  • FOOTNOTES CHICAGO - Page 7



  • immiadvise
    12-30 03:11 PM
    hi All,

    i'm new to this forum.please advice on my situation.

    I was on F1 earlier and now I am on H1b from jan 2007.
    I am the first person for whom company filed H1B and got approved.
    I am the only person on my companies payroll and only person on their H1B. Is that going to be a probelm if i go for H1B stamping to mexico?
    If i go for stamping to mexico, What sort of questions i will be asked?

    Please help me ...

    Thanks



    more...


    footnotes chicago style. The nov chicago style research
  • The nov chicago style research



  • blogger
    06-24 10:01 AM
    Hi, I'm a citizen of India got married to an Indian citizen in U.S in 2004 and got the marriage license from a county (It is important to note that a marriage license is valid only in the County in which it is issued). We did not marry under foreign act. Will this be considered as a valid marriage as per Indian marriage act? Please advice.

    We are yet to get married in India. We are planning to apply I-485 with martial �single� independently because we can�t apply as married due to family reasons.

    Will this cause any problem during background check?





    footnotes chicago style. Chicago Style Example
  • Chicago Style Example



  • sanju
    03-02 11:32 AM
    This is good stuff. Thanks for posting it. Not sure if many people have looked at this study because everyone is busy fighting in gulti v/s panju v/s guju v/s bihari v/s others w/s every other category we can think.

    I suggest you delete this thread as no wants to look at this.


    .



    more...


    footnotes chicago style. APA style Chicago style
  • APA style Chicago style



  • glus
    12-11 05:01 PM
    You are still on H1 status. Why do you want to apply for AP. Get your H1 stamped when you leave the country and you can get in on H1 status.

    Vicks_don: I think you answer is not the best advise. If he asks for help with AP, try to give the person a good advise if you know it. If he goes by your advise, what happens if for some reason he does not get the H1 stamped? A person leaving US should always apply for AP when his/hers I485 is pending if he/she has no visa stamp in his/hers passport. If he goes for H1stamp, and the stamp is denied for whatever reason, he will still be able to come back to the states using the AP and continue I485 application. But if one leaves, and has no valid visa stamp and stamping is denied, one will not be able to come back to the states.

    G





    footnotes chicago style. APA style Chicago style
  • APA style Chicago style



  • ArkBird
    02-17 05:52 PM
    I filed back in June, 07. I got second FP notice for my wife. Nothing for me so far and I am primary applicant.



    more...


    footnotes chicago style. the Chicago style uses a
  • the Chicago style uses a



  • msp1976
    01-11 11:34 AM
    Hello All,
    I am on 7th year of my H1 and my I-140 is pending. Since my current H1 is about to expire, I need to file for my 8th year of H1 extension. Do you think there could be some problem in getting my 8th year extension since my labor is approved and I-140 is pending. The way I interpreted the extension rule is that you can only get the extension if your labor is pending for more than 1 year but in my case my labor is approved and I-140 is pending.And I cannot wait for I-140 approval since my current H1 is about to expire.

    Please advise.

    Thanks

    No ..There would be no problem...
    In fact tell the lawyer to attach the 140 application receipt to the H1 extension and ask for a 3 year extension..at least 1 year they got to give...





    footnotes chicago style. chicago manual of style
  • chicago manual of style



  • wizkid732
    08-26 07:47 AM
    Thanks overseas.
    Just curious... has your case been approved?
    I got a letter to the ombudsman's query to USCIS. They clearly mentioned that it was in a name check/background check process and it might take time.

    They threw in some words like, that kind of checks resulted in sex crimes, terrorist links and violent crimes etc so that no one will question the time i suppose.

    I have been at wrong place at wrong time. I applied for the GC in 2001 and never passed the labor stage till mid 2005 (NY cases stuck in Apr 2001 forever, my company shut down).

    I applied on a different labor substitution in 2005 when and got denied as the employer applied the labor to more than one case. I think this might be the reason for the name check. I started clean again in sept 2005 and it is pending thus far.

    I used the AC 21 and moved on after the 2007 fiasco. 5 yrs in the US is a long time as far as the employment goes :-).


    wizkid732,

    My case is in background check a.k.a extended review. I tried all the means without any success. Infopass, Ombudsman and senator told me that there is no time limit for these kind of cases. Few unlucky cases gets stuck in this and yes the wait will be very painful if you wait. Best thing is followup every 3 months or so and only think about it on the day or two you followed up.

    On the other hand I heard about about few cases where USCIS has told that the application is in extended review but issued the card within a month or so. So I think sometimes they just say that to reduce the enquires temporarily and I hope yours is one of those cases.



    more...


    footnotes chicago style. APA style Chicago style
  • APA style Chicago style



  • sukhyani
    01-27 11:43 PM
    These are minor things, although annoying, but I wouldn't worry about them. I guess it's just your GC interview. The good thing is that they are processing your case. I would suggest taking your lawyer with you. When is your interview? Just curious what is the time frame. Good luck.

    Thanks

    Interview is scheduled during the first week of March.





    footnotes chicago style. Turabian Style - Sample
  • Turabian Style - Sample



  • andy_8214
    09-15 07:52 PM
    Chandu keeps opening the threads and keeps talking to himself....he is so lonely.



    more...


    footnotes chicago style. APA style Chicago style
  • APA style Chicago style



  • meridiani.planum
    07-19 02:10 PM
    Hi Leoindiano:

    What is meant by Pre-Adjudication and how do we know that, our case is Pre-Adjudicated. Sorry to ask you this qn. specifically, as I amnot seeing any LUDs on my case, and my para-legal says, dont worry.

    my case details are PD10/05 EB2 I, RD 07/02/07 and ND 08/30/07 at TSC.

    Can you enlighten us little bit more.

    preadjudication is where USCIS processes your case even when visa numbers are not going to be available: meaning ur PD is not current, they know even if all is well they wont be able to approve, but still they go over everything, issue an RFE is something is not ok etc. If all is well, the case goes into a pre-adjudicated stack, and once visa numbers are available, they simply pick up a file from that stack, assign it a visa and mark it approved. This is how lots of people got approvals last year in july VB.

    pre-adjudication has three advantages compared to starting to process only when teh PD is current:
    - If they wait for PD to be current to pick up a file and start looking at it, there is no way they can process so many cases when the PD does go current, or when dates move significantly towards the end of the year. This is how they processed nearly 60k cases in 2 months last year.
    - if PD is current for a short period (1month or 2) and thats when they pick up your case, if you get a NOID you could end up missing the window by the time you respond and they pick up your response.
    - its helpful for them because they can weed out cases that are not going to be approved, earlier and they dont end up giving interim benefits to those people.

    ur status does not change when your case is pre-adjudicated.





    footnotes chicago style. The Chicago manual of style.
  • The Chicago manual of style.



  • shadowbuddy
    03-15 02:14 AM
    Hi All,

    I need your help and suggestions. In November of last year my wife and I submitted our medicals and AOS applications. Our checks were never cashed. I informed my lawyer after a month of not seeing the checks cash and raised the question then. They replied that there is a lot of mail going through that room and just wait a bit more. Another month went by, nothing. Then another.

    Here it is March 2009 and my lawyer finally contacts USCIS to find out that they cannot find my original application. (no receipt notice was issued) During the entire last year and right up until March my Prioirty Date was always current. Now there is SEVERE retrogression and my PD date is now not current.

    We have to refile. I re-wrote the checks and we are submitting the package again.

    How can we demand that our application be accepted based on the original filing date of November when we were current?

    would the dated medicals prove that we submitted in November. Who would get their paperwork done then sit on it for months right?!?!?!

    How do we challenge USCIS based on their error. My lawyer said they have a delivery confirmation for the original application however I have not seen that.

    thanks!





    footnotes chicago style. Footnotes In Chicago Style
  • Footnotes In Chicago Style



  • randlesl
    November 17th, 2004, 02:38 PM
    Hello,

    I am a new commer with no photography experience. I bought the D70 body with the sigma 28-80mm/3.5-5.6 and the 70-300mm/4-5.6 lens. when taking pics with the 28-80mm lens the pics seem to be alittle blurry and dark, and with the 70-300mm comes out alot clearer and slightly brighter. I am mostly taking pics of people in action, in the house (pics of kids while playing) where the lighting is alittle dim, but not dark. I am wondering if I need to get a new lenes with a better fstop or what to help my pics out??? I must include that I am not trying to use the flash because of the harsh lighting effect that it has. can anyone recommend what I should do to clear up my pics?





    irrational
    11-05 11:50 AM
    You should probably call USCIS to see what is going on ?

    Reciept Notices should be sent immideatly as soon as they recieve the application. If it has been that long, I would recommend calling them and see what the hell is going on.

    I did not get my reciept notices too. Luckily, I had the reciept numbers from the back of my checks. I called and found out that they were sent to the wrong address. I immideatly corrected my address online.





    clif
    10-15 07:41 AM
    There is nothing illegal about working part-time using EAD while working full-time on H1B. It has nothing to do with last entry into US. In fact, EAD has nothing to do with entering US. To enter US, you need either a valid visa or valid AP. IO won't even ask you about your EAD.

    EAD and H1B are mutually exclusive. If you are maintaining proper H1 status (ie, have a valid H1 status and working full-time for the job for which you have H1), it is completely legal to do flip burgers or drive cabs using EAD to supplement your income. It does not affect H1 status. I have confirmed this with multiple attorneys on multiple occasions.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment